연락처 : CU 이메일 : verlenemacansh@gmail.com

Not every day does one stumble upon a discussion as intriguing as this, but I recently had the pleasure of revisiting a particularly intriguing discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The topic? The growing issue of electric neon signs—specifically those brightly colored signs outside shops and factories situated near major roadways. At the time, these signs were causing a considerable amount of confusion for motorists.

Why? Because they were so similar to the automatic traffic signals that motorists used to guide them. This led to a heated exchange, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, outlined the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local authorities had the right to order the removal of any sign or object that could be mistaken for a traffic signal. In theory, this would help clear up any confusion caused by neon signs in areas near busy roads.

However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as straightforward as it appeared. In the House, Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who exactly decides what counts as a problem?" he asked. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the local authorities to decide that. This raised the question of whether there would be uniformity—would each area take a different approach? Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had had enough data on this particular issue.

After all, with the rise of electric lighting, surely the Ministry should have research and a policy in place to handle the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, insisted that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He insisted that it was for the councils to take the appropriate action, and that his superior was already considering it. Yet, Mr. Jones raised another important concern: should not the Minister of Transport be more involved in ensuring a uniform approach?

This is where the debate really became interesting—should it be left to local authorities to address it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a consistent, national solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson acknowledged that the matter was indeed causing difficulty, though he deferred to the Ministry’s internal discussions for a more decisive plan.

He suggested that the situation would be closely reviewed, but as yet, no firm action had been taken. What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a seemingly small issue—electric signage—could spark such a substantial discussion in Parliament. While today we may take these kinds of discussions for granted, it was a time when any change in technology—even something as simple as new signage—could create ripple effects across society.

If you have any type of inquiries regarding where and the best ways to utilize buy neon lights, you can contact us at our own web-site.